By
Anna Eleria and Rebecca Scibek
Newton Tab, Wednesday, October 4 2006
While this summer was filled with warm, sunny days that
encouraged recreation on the Charles River and in its
parklands, it also saw an explosive growth of a
potentially harmful algae in the Lower Charles.
First identified in early August, the
fluorescent green algal bloom extended from the
Harvard/Massachusetts Avenue Bridge east to the Museum
of Science, with dense, floating mats of algae most
visible in lagoons, canals and along the river’s edge in
Boston and Cambridge.
Algal blooms have been a problem in
the Charles River for years, but this year’s bloom was
remarkable for two reasons. First, it was the first time
that the algae bloom was identified - a sample collected
in early August was identified as microcystis, a type of
blue-green algae that secretes toxins and grows
naturally in fresh and estuarine waters. Second, the
amount of algae was extremely large. The abundance of
algae was due to heavy late spring and early summer
rainstorms that brought an enormous influx of nutrients
to the river, followed by a period of extremely warm
water temperatures, creating perfect conditions for
algae growth.
In
early August, the density of sampled algae was ten times
greater than the moderate health risk threshold
designated by the World Health Organization (WHO).
Samples taken the second week in September by
Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation
(DCR) showed that algae levels had decreased
significantly, close to the WHO low health risk
threshold. CRWA sent water samples (with algae
concentrations slightly above the low health risk
probability threshold) to a laboratory at the State
University of New York in Syracuse to determine if and
how much of the toxin was released by the algae. The
results showed that a small, but significant, amount of
toxin was present in the water at that time. Exposure to
the toxin at that level could lead to short-term health
problems such as skin irritations, diarrhea, and nausea.
To notify the public of the potential
hazard, CRWA informed all boathouses involved in the
Flagging Program, a daily water quality public
notification system, of the algal bloom, and instructed
those within the affected area to fly red “do not boat”
flags. DCR posted signs along the river warning people
to avoid direct contact with the water. CRWA and state
environmental and health agencies are continuing to work
together to better monitor and understand the algae
issue.
Algae is a natural and critical part
of the Charles River ecosystem that provides food for
fish and other small aquatic animals. However, too much
algae drives the ecosystems out of balance, as it blocks
sunlight from underwater plants, creates large day-night
swings in oxygen levels in the water, produces scum and
odor and may secrete large amounts of toxins. Upon
die-off, algae consumes large amounts of oxygen, which
can damage or kill fish and plant species that are
dependent on dissolved oxygen in the water.
The primary cause of algal blooms in
freshwater is excessive phosphorus, a nutrient found in
wastewater treatment plant discharges and in stormwater
runoff. The single greatest source of nutrients in the
Charles River is run-off from high-density residential
land, which comprises nearly fifty percent of Newton’s
land. Lawn fertilizers, soaps and detergents are the
main human sources of phosphorus. Other “natural”
sources of phosphorus from residential areas are
decaying leaves, grass clippings, and pet waste, all of
which increase the level of algae-inducing nutrients
when they flow into the river through storm drains or
small streams.
The property management practices of
homeowners and municipalities have a dramatic impact of
the amount of nutrients flowing into the Charles.
Property owners should minimize fertilizer use, use only
low phosphorus fertilizers, pick up and dispose of dog
waste, and dispose of yard waste properly (not in the
street or into storm drains). Cities and towns should
minimize the use of fertilizers on public playing
fields, parks and landscaped areas, provide yard waste
pickup, enforce “pooper-scooper” laws, clean catch
basins regularly, and build “green infrastructure”
wherever possible.
Other factors, such as low river flow
volume, warm water temperature and the presence of dams,
magnify the impacts of phosphorus and increase algae
growth. CRWA continues to develop science-based
solutions to tackle these problems, and to advocate for
policies and programs that will help reduce algae levels
and ensure cleaner, safer waters for fish, wildlife and
the public.
Anna Eleria is a CRWA Project Manager/Engineer,
and Rebecca Scibek is CRWA Volunteer Coordinator |